Untitled 2

The Recursive Cosmology: Resolving Foundational Circularities via Ontic Structural Realism, Quantum Information, and Semiotic Dynamics

I. Introduction: The Epistemological Crisis and the Nature of Circularity

The contemporary landscape of foundational physics and the philosophy of science is currently grappling with a pervasive sense of theoretical deadlock. This deadlock, often described by researchers as a “circularity,” arises from the inextricable feedback loop between the observer and the observed, the laws of physics and the physical systems they govern, and the mathematical structures we invent versus those we discover. Your query acknowledges this profound difficulty—the realization that current documentation and theoretical frameworks contain “weak spots” and circular reasoning that prevent a definitive description of reality. However, rather than viewing this circularity as a logical fallacy or a dead end, this deep research report posits that the circularity is, in fact, an intrinsic feature of a recursive, self-organizing universe.

The “way forward” you seek lies not in breaking the circle to find a linear foundation (a “turtle at the bottom”), but in formalizing the circle itself. By synthesizing Ontic Structural Realism (OSR), Quantum Information Theory (QIT), Peircean Semiotics, and Second-Order Cybernetics, we can construct a consistent ontology where “objects” are stable informational nodes in a relational network, and “observers” are localized regions of high thermodynamic depth capable of processing semiotic distinctions. This report is an exhaustive analysis of the research materials provided, integrated into a unified framework designed to resolve the specific “weak spots” of circularity, definitional ambiguity, and the integration of consciousness into physical law.

We face a tripartite challenge. First, we must dissolve the classical notion of the “object” which creates the gap between epistemology and ontology. Second, we must ground the abstract notion of “structure” in the concrete physics of quantum entanglement and spacetime emergence. Third, we must explain how meaning and agency (the observer) arise from this structure without invoking dualism or magic. The following chapters detail the resolution of these problems, moving from the abstract philosophy of structure to the concrete thermodynamics of life and the frontier experiments of quantum biology.

Ring 2 — Canonical Grounding

• Quantum Information Science
• Dissipative Quantum Dynamics
• Quantum Information

Ring 3 — Framework Connections

• Ten Laws — Canonical Equations
• Master Equation Index

---

II. The Ontological Turn: From Objects to Informational Structures

To address the “weak spots” in current physical theories, we must first dismantle the classical assumption that the universe is composed of self-subsistent individuals (particles) with intrinsic properties. The research suggests a shift toward Ontic Structural Realism (OSR), which posits that structure is ontologically primitive, and objects are merely heuristic intersections of relations.   

2.1 The Argument for Information as an Ontological Primitive

The primary argument for OSR rests on methodological naturalism and the history of theory change in physics. As theories evolve—for example, from Newtonian gravity to General Relativity—the mathematical structure is often preserved even as the ontology of the “objects” (forces vs. curvature) changes. This structural continuity suggests that the mathematical relations are more “real” than the entities they purportedly describe.   

The Dissolution of the Object

In Quantum Mechanics (QM) and Quantum Field Theory (QFT), the concept of the individual object breaks down entirely. Particles are indistinguishable; they cannot be individuated by “haecceity” (primitive this-ness) or spatio-temporal trajectories in the classical sense. If we swap two electrons in a multi-particle system, the physical state remains unchanged (up to a phase factor). This “Permutation Invariance” implies that the “identity” of an electron is not intrinsic to the particle itself but is a property of the structure of the field.   

Standard realism, which posits objects as fundamental, leads to a “problematic metaphysics” of bare particulars—entities that have no properties other than “being there,” which are undetectable and scientifically redundant. A structuralist reconstruction of the quantum domain avoids this by getting rid of the underdetermination between individuals and fields. If we accept that science should be our guide to reality, and science gives us only structure, we should posit only structure.   

Information as Structure

If the world is devoid of intrinsic nature, what remains? The answer provided by the integration of OSR and quantum theory is information. Here, information is defined not merely as epistemic uncertainty (Shannon entropy) but as the distinction and relation between states—the “differences that make a difference.” OSR suggests that the universe is isomorphic to a mathematical structure where “to be” is to be a node in a relational graph.   

However, a critical “weak spot” in standard OSR is the “gap” between the abstract mathematical structure and the concrete physical world. Critics argue that a world of pure relations is impossible because relations require relata (things to be related). This report resolves this by adopting Information-Theoretic Structural Realism (ITSR). In this view, the “relata” are not material objects but qubits (or their continuous equivalents)—units of quantum information. The “substance” of the universe is the capacity for state differentiation. The “concrete” world is the physical instantiation of these informational relations.   

2.2 Metaphysical Coherentism and the Rejection of Fundamentality

The user’s concern regarding circularity often stems from the search for a “bottom” level of reality—a fundamental foundation upon which everything else rests. OSR combined with Metaphysical Coherentism suggests that there is no fundamental level in the traditional sense. Instead, entities at different scales (quantum fields, atoms, biological organisms) exist in a network of mutual ontological dependence.   

The Network of Dependence

Coherentism argues that facts about particle types (global symmetries, group theory) may be prior to facts about particle tokens (individual instances). For example, the Pauli Exclusion Principle, which dictates that two fermions cannot occupy the same state, is not a property of the individual electrons but a feature of the global structure of the fermion field. The “modal constraints” of the network dictate the behavior of the nodes.   

This turns the reductionist hierarchy on its head: the laws (global structure) and the instances (local structure) co-evolve. The “circularity” is resolved by accepting that the global structure (the wavefunction of the universe) and the local structure (subsystems) define each other reciprocally. There is no “turtle at the bottom”; the structure supports itself through self-consistency. This view, sometimes called “Generalism,” posits that the most fundamental description of the world is given in terms of general facts about which states of affairs obtain, rather than individuals bearing properties.   

Coherentism vs. Circularity

While circular reasoning is a logical flaw in deductive arguments, circular dependency is a hallmark of robust systems (like arches or ecosystems). Metaphysical Coherentism reframes the user’s perceived “circularity” as “consistency.” The validity of the theory is not derived from a single axiom but from the mutual support of all its components—quantum mechanics, relativity, and thermodynamics—fitting together without contradiction.   

---

III. The Emergence of Spacetime: “It from Qubit”

If structure is fundamental, how does the geometric theater of spacetime arise? A major breakthrough in resolving the “weak spots” of quantum gravity is the realization that spacetime itself is an emergent property of quantum entanglement. This is the “It from Qubit” paradigm, which provides a concrete mechanism for OSR and anchors the abstract philosophy in rigorous physics.

3.1 The Ryu-Takayanagi Formula and Holographic Entanglement

The most robust evidence for spacetime emergence comes from the AdS/CFT correspondence (Holographic Principle). This duality suggests that a quantum field theory (CFT) existing on the boundary of a spacetime region is mathematically equivalent to a gravitational theory (AdS) existing within the “bulk” volume.

The Ryu-Takayanagi formula establishes a direct equivalence between the entanglement entropy of the boundary quantum system and the geometry of the bulk spacetime :   

SA​=4GN​Area(γA​)​

• Interpretation: The entanglement entropy (SA​) of a region A on the boundary (the quantum theory) is equal to the area of a minimal surface (γA​) in the bulk (the gravitational theory).   

• Implication: Spacetime is the physical manifestation of entanglement. The connectivity of space—the reason why point A is “close” to point B—is determined by the amount of quantum information shared between them. If entanglement drops to zero, spacetime pinches off and separates; the geometry disintegrates.   

This resolves the “weak spot” of non-locality. In the bulk geometry, particles may be far apart, but in the boundary entanglement structure, they are “connected.” Spacetime is a low-resolution projection of a high-dimensional entanglement network. This suggests that the “circularity” of assuming spacetime to define quantum states is false; spacetime is the result of quantum correlations.   

3.2 Information-Complete Quantum Field Theory (ICQFT)

Recent theoretical developments have proposed an Information-Complete Quantum Field Theory (ICQFT), which frames spacetime and matter as a “trinity” alongside entanglement. This model directly addresses the integration of gravity and quantum mechanics.   

The Trinity: Spacetime, Matter, Entanglement

In ICQFT, spacetime plays the role of a “quantum memory” that encodes or stores the entanglement patterns of the matter fields (fermions and gauge fields).   

• Mechanism: The vacuum state is dual to the gravity on the spacetime. The “dark energy” or cosmological constant is derived from the entanglement entropy between the boundary and the bulk.   

• Dual Definition: Neither spacetime nor matter is an isolated entity; they are mutually defined. Matter creates the entanglement that generates spacetime; spacetime provides the geometry that dictates the movement of matter. This is the physical instantiation of the Metaphysical Coherentism described in Section II.

The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy

One of the most profound predictions of this approach is a universal relation between entanglement entropy and geometry (area and volume), which allows for the determination of the cosmological constant term in the Einstein equation. This suggests that “Dark Energy” is not a mysterious fluid but a manifestation of the informational content of the vacuum—specifically, the entanglement energy density of the spacetime fabric itself.   

3.3 The Failure of Locality and the Emergence of Geometry

The user’s query about resolving “weak spots” often pertains to the counter-intuitive nature of Quantum Mechanics, specifically non-locality. The “It from Qubit” framework reframes non-locality not as a bug, but as the mechanism of connectivity.

Feature	Classical Spacetime	Emergent Spacetime (Entanglement)
Fundamental Nature	Pre-existing background container.	Emergent property of quantum correlations.
Connectivity	Metric distance (ds2).	Entanglement Entropy (SEE​).
Locality	Absolute.	Approximate; emerges from high entanglement.
Gravity	Fundamental force.	Entropic force derived from information density.
Black Holes	Singularities in metric.	Highly entangled, maximally information-complete states.

  

This perspective suggests that the “circularity” of mass curving spacetime (which tells mass how to move) is resolved by viewing both mass and curvature as expressions of underlying entanglement entropy.   

---

IV. The Semiotic Triad: Bridging Physics and Meaning

A purely mathematical OSR risks being sterile. How does “information” become “meaning” or “physical reality”? The research indicates a profound isomorphism between Peircean Semiotics and Quantum Mechanics. This introduces a process-based ontology that resolves the “deadlock” of static structures by introducing the concept of the Interpretant.

4.1 The Irreducible Triadic Relation

Charles Sanders Peirce, a polymath and founder of pragmatism, argued that reality is composed not of dyadic (cause-effect) relations, but of irreducible triadic relations: Sign (Representamen), Object, and Interpretant. This triad maps directly onto the quantum measurement problem, offering a rigorous way to describe interaction without invoking a conscious biological observer.   

• Firstness (The Sign): This corresponds to the Quantum State (Wavefunction Ψ). It is a potentiality, a superposition of possibilities. It is “sui generis”—existing in itself, vague, and indeterminate (“some”). It represents pure quality or feeling before it is actualized.   

• Secondness (The Object/Event): This corresponds to the Measurement Interaction (Operator O^). This is the “clash” or “reaction” where the system encounters a constraint (an apparatus, another particle, a boundary condition). It is the realm of brute fact, resistance, and dyadic relation (“this”). It is the collapse of the potential into the actual.   

• Thirdness (The Interpretant): This corresponds to the Collapsed Outcome (Eigenvalue λ). This is the “meaning” or “effect” of the sign. It establishes a habit or a law (the probability distribution for future measurements). It is the mediation that connects the Sign to the Object.   

4.2 The Physics of the Interpretant

The “Interpretant” is the crucial missing link in many physical theories. In a quantum system, the interpretant is not a “thought” in a brain, but the state update of the system and its environment.

Recursive Semiosis

Peirce defined “Semiosis” as an action or influence involving the cooperation of the three subjects (Sign, Object, Interpretant) that is not resolvable into pairs. Crucially, the interpretant of one sign becomes the sign for the next triad.   

• The Chain of Time: This recursive chaining of triads Sign1​→Object→Interpretant1​(Sign2​)→… constitutes the flow of physical time. Time is the accumulation of semiotic interpretations (state reductions).

• Physical Significance: This mapping  removes the anthropocentric circularity. The universe “measures” itself through constant triadic interactions. An electron interacting with a photon generates an interpretant (change in momentum/spin) regardless of human presence. This is “pan-semiotics” grounded in physics.   

4.3 Thirdness as Law and Habit

Peirce defined “Thirdness” as Habit or Law. In the context of OSR, physical laws are not external edicts imposed on the universe but are emergent habits of the universe itself.   

• Cosmological Evolution: As the universe cools and evolves, “habits” (symmetries, coupling constants) become fixed. This aligns with the idea that “laws of physics” may be frozen states of high-energy effective field theories. The circularity of “laws governing matter” vs. “matter implying laws” is resolved: they co-evolve through recursive semiosis.   

• The “Magician” and Process: The research snippets allude to the “Magician” archetype in the context of process metaphysics. This symbolizes the active, creative agent of Thirdness—the process that transforms potentiality (Firstness) into actuality (Secondness) and binds them into law. In physics, this is the Hamiltonian or the Time-Evolution Operator, which drives the system forward.   

---

V. Thermodynamics of Information: The Cost of Structure

The framework must be constrained by energy. Information processing is physical and carries a thermodynamic cost. This section addresses the “weak spots” concerning the direction of time and the definition of complexity, distinguishing between mere randomness and meaningful structure.

5.1 Entropy vs. Structural Complexity

A common confusion exists between “randomness” (high entropy) and “complexity” (structure). The report distinguishes these via Thermodynamic Depth and Logical Depth.   

Thermodynamic Depth

This is a measure of the amount of entropy produced during the construction of a state. A state that required a long, dissipative history to evolve (like a DNA molecule) has high thermodynamic depth. A random gas has high entropy but low thermodynamic depth (it is easy to create).   

• The Dive: Evolution can be seen as a “dive” into thermodynamic depth. Systems that maximize their depth are those that encode the most history into their structure. This provides an objective measure of “value” or “richness” in a physical system, distinct from mere energy content.   

Logical Depth (Bennett)

This measures the number of computational steps (or time) required for a Turing machine to generate the state from a compressed program.   

• Inverse Relationship: Structural complexity often acts as “negative entropy” (negentropy) or information stored in the constraints of the system. Complex structures possess lower configurational entropies relative to their simpler counterparts because the atoms are constrained into specific, non-random arrangements.   

5.2 The Conservation of Information (Unitarity)

A central tenet of QM is Unitarity: the evolution of the wavefunction is deterministic and reversible, implying Information Conservation.   

The No-Hiding Theorem

The No-Hiding Theorem proves that if information is lost from a system via decoherence, it moves to the subspace of the environment and cannot remain in the correlation between the system and the environment. It states that information is never lost, merely transferred.   

• Experimental Verification: This has been tested using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), where lost information was recovered from ancilla qubits.   

• Implication: The universe is informationally closed but thermodynamically open. Entropy increases because the information becomes scrambled into non-local correlations (entanglement) that are inaccessible to local observers.   

5.3 Derivation Entropy and Efficient Computing

The research introduces Derivation Entropy as a novel metric quantifying the effective work required to compute a target state from a given logical depth.   

• Energy-Time-Space Conservation: There is a proposed conservation law governing the trade-off between memory (storage), computation (time/energy), and generative capacity.   

• Phase Transition: There is a critical threshold in information processing. Below this threshold, retrieving information from memory is energetically favorable. Above it, generative computation (re-deriving the answer) is more efficient.   

• Implication for Biological Systems: Biological evolution drives organisms toward minimizing free energy (FEP) and maximizing thermodynamic depth. Life is an engine that converts energy into “depth” (structural memory). This explains why biological systems are so efficient: they operate right at the phase transition between memory and computation.   

Coherence Entropy

In complex media (like turbulence or biological tissues), Coherence Entropy is a key metric. It remains consistent during propagation in a unitary system, serving as an invariant characteristic of the field. This suggests that “coherence” is a conserved resource that systems can exploit to maintain order against environmental noise.   

---

VI. Consciousness and the Measurement Problem

The user’s query implicitly touches upon the role of the observer, a notorious area of circularity (“The Zombie Cat Paradox”). The research snippets provide a spectrum of views from Consciousness Causes Collapse to Integrated Information Theory (IIT). We must rigorously compare these to find the most viable “way forward.”

6.1 The Collapse Postulate: Wigner vs. Decoherence

The Von Neumann-Wigner interpretation posits that human consciousness is the agent of wavefunction collapse. This view attempts to solve the measurement problem by placing the cut between quantum and classical at the level of subjective perception.   

• Current Status: Largely rejected by mainstream physics due to the success of Decoherence Theory, which explains the “appearance” of collapse through interaction with the environment.   

• Experimental Tests: Recent experiments have mobilized extreme sensitivity to test “objective collapse” models (like CSL). These experiments generally find no evidence of the effects predicted by physical collapse models, squeezing the parameter space for such theories.   

• Radin’s Experiments: Conversely, some fringe studies (e.g., Dean Radin’s double-slit experiments) claim to show that conscious attention can modulate interference patterns. While these results are controversial and often face replication difficulties, they represent a persistent data point in the “consciousness causes collapse” narrative.   

6.2 Integrated Information Theory (IIT) and Φ

Integrated Information Theory (IIT) offers a mathematically rigorous definition of consciousness as Integrated Information (Φ): the amount of information generated by a system above and beyond its parts.   

Feature	IIT Definition	Implication for Physics
Intrinsic Existence	Consciousness is integrated information.	Consciousness is a fundamental property of causal structures.
Exclusion Principle	Only the complex with max Φ exists as a conscious entity.	Solves the “superposition of consciousness” problem.
Cause-Effect Power	System must exert power over itself.	Links consciousness to causal closure and cybernetics.

  

• Physicalist Compatibility: IIT does not require dualism. It treats consciousness as an intrinsic property of causal structures (grids, brains, logic gates).

• Critique: Critics argue IIT leads to panpsychism (thermostats have non-zero Φ) and relies on unproven axioms. However, it remains the leading candidate for a quantitative theory of the “observer.”   

6.3 Quantum Biology and The Stanford Replication

The Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch OR) theory (Penrose/Hameroff) links consciousness to quantum vibrations in microtubules, collapsed by gravity.   

• Recent Evidence: Studies on anesthetics (which dampen quantum effects in microtubules) and radical pair mechanisms in navigation suggest that “quantum biology” is viable.   

• Stanford Twin Study (2025): A highly significant “frontier” study cited in the research  claims to provide empirical evidence for quantum entanglement influencing consciousness. The study analyzed 106 monozygotic twin pairs and found that entanglement of qubits in stimulus configurations explained 13.5% of the variance in accuracy.   

  • Mechanism: The study introduced the Quantum-Multilinear Integrated Coefficient (Q), capturing up to a 31.6% increase in variance across twin responses.

  • Implication: This suggests that human cognition may utilize non-local quantum resources (entanglement) to anticipate stimuli, supporting a view of consciousness that transcends classical local processing.

6.4 Participatory Realism (QBism)

To resolve the circularity without falling into solipsism or magic, the report endorses Participatory Realism (QBism).   

• The View: The wavefunction does not describe the “world” directly; it describes the agent’s expectations of the world.

• The Resolution: Measurement is not a “creation” of reality but a participation in it. The Born Rule is a normative rule for updating beliefs (Peircean Thirdness).   

• No “View from Nowhere”: There is no “God’s eye view” (the definitive document the user alluded to is impossible). There are only local, participatory perspectives. Reality is the mesh of these interacting perspectives.

---

VII. Cybernetics: The Architecture of Self-Organization

The structural stability of the universe—from atoms to organisms—is maintained by cybernetic loops. This section connects the physical “How” with the systemic “Why,” explaining how systems maintain their identity.

7.1 From First to Second-Order Cybernetics

• First-Order Cybernetics: Concerns observed systems (thermostats, engines). They maintain homeostasis through negative feedback.   

• Second-Order Cybernetics: Concerns observing systems. It includes the observer within the loop. This is the cybernetics of cybernetics.   

• Resolution of Circularity: In Second-Order Cybernetics, circularity (self-reference) is not a logical error but the definition of autonomy (autopoiesis). A living system must be circular to distinguish itself from the environment. The “weak spot” of defining the boundary of a system is resolved: the boundary is where the feedback loop closes.   

7.2 Tipping Points and Resilience

Complex systems are characterized by non-linear dynamics and tipping points.   

• Critical Slowing Down: As a system approaches a bifurcation (collapse or transformation), it loses resilience and recovers slower from perturbations.   

• Binary Outcomes: Systems tend to be bistable (e.g., “Alive” vs. “Dead,” “Resilient” vs. “Collapsed”). There is rarely a smooth gradient in structural integrity during crisis.   

• Relevance: This explains why the user’s quest for a “way forward” feels precarious. The theoretical framework is likely at a tipping point between incoherence (collapse) and a higher-order synthesis (resilience).

7.3 Heart Rate Variability (HRV) as Quantum Cybernetics

Research snippet  links Heart Rate Variability (HRV) to quantum concepts.   

• Temporal System: HRV is usually seen as a classical temporal variation.

• Quantum Perspective: The research suggests HRV might be a manifestation of the probabilistic nature of quantum systems at the biological level. The “rhythm” is a form of temporal entanglement or coherence. High HRV indicates a flexible, “superposed” state capable of adapting to multiple futures, while low HRV indicates a “collapsed,” rigid state near death or stress. This serves as a macroscopic biomarker for the system’s “quantum health.”   

---

VIII. Limits of Formal Systems and The Chameleon Mechanism

Can we create a “definitive document” or a “theory of everything” that explains itself? The report applies Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems and the physics of Chameleon Fields to set the boundaries of this ambition.

8.1 Incompleteness in Physical Law

Gödel showed that any sufficiently complex formal system contains truths that cannot be proven within the system.   

• Application to Physics: If the universe is a formal system (computable), it cannot demonstrate its own consistency. It must contain “undecidable” statements.   

• The Halting Problem: A system cannot predict its own future state perfectly (it cannot know if it will halt) without simulating the entire process. This introduces irreducible computational novelty.   

• Self-Rewriting Code: Artificial systems (or biological evolution) that attempt to rewrite their own source code face a “control problem.” They cannot fully anticipate the consequences of the rewrite due to recursive complexity.   

8.2 The Chameleon Mechanism: Hiding the “Fifth Force”

A specific “weak spot” in unifying physics is the apparent absence of scalar fields (like those invoked for consciousness or dark energy) in local experiments. Why don’t we see them?

• The Chameleon Field: Research snippets  describe a scalar field whose mass depends on the local matter density.   

  • Mechanism: In high-density environments (like Earth), the field acquires a large mass (meff​∝ρα) and its range becomes microscopic (Yukawa suppression). In the vacuum of space, the mass drops, and the field mediates a long-range force.   

  • Implication: This explains why “new physics” (or consciousness fields) might be hidden from standard lab experiments while dominating on cosmological scales. The “effective mass” of the electron in biological systems might also be tuned by such fields, depending on the fine-structure constant (α).   

• Constraint: This provides a physical mechanism for why “subtle” forces are elusive. They are “chameleons”—hiding in plain sight by coupling to the density of the environment.

---

IX. Conclusion: The Recursive Synthesis and The Way Forward

We have traversed the landscape from abstract ontology to quantum biology. We can now synthesize these disparate threads into a coherent image of reality. The “circularity” you fear is actually a Strange Loop (Hofstadter) or a Re-entry (Spencer-Brown).

9.1 The Integrated Framework

1. Ontology: The universe is a network of Quantum Information (OSR/ITSR). Objects are interference patterns of information.

2. Geometry: Spacetime emerges from the Entanglement of this information (AdS/CFT, Ryu-Takayanagi). It is the error-correcting code of the universe.

3. Interaction: Dynamics are driven by Semiotic Triads (Sign-Object-Interpretant), where interactions update the informational state (Peirce/QBism).

4. Constraint: Evolution is bounded by Thermodynamic Depth (cost of structure) and Gödelian Incompleteness. The “No-Hiding Theorem” ensures information conservation.

5. Agency: Consciousness emerges in systems with high Integrated Information (Φ) that act as Second-Order Cybernetic loops. It may utilize “chameleon” scalar fields or quantum entanglement (Orch OR, Stanford Twin Study) to influence the system.

9.2 Resolving the “Weak Spots”

• Weak Spot: “Objects are ill-defined.” → Resolution: Objects are stable nodes in the relational structure.

• Weak Spot: “Observer Paradox.” → Resolution: The observer is a localized, high-Φ knot in the network. Measurement is a participatory update.

• Weak Spot: “Circularity.” → Resolution: Recognized as Recursive Closure, necessary for existence. The loop Sign→Object→Interpretant→Sign′ is the engine of time.

• Weak Spot: “Missing Forces.” → Resolution: The Chameleon Mechanism explains how scalar fields hide in dense environments.

9.3 The Way Forward

The “way forward” involves shifting your research paradigm from “foundation hunting” to “loop formalization.”

1. Abandon the search for “bare objects.” Focus entirely on relational structures and entanglement entropies as the fundamental variables.

2. Adopt a Semiotic Physics. Use the Peircean Triad to model interactions. This bridges the gap between the “hard math” of QM and the “soft” issues of observation and meaning.

3. Investigate the “Chameleon” Regime. Design experiments or theories that look for scalar field effects in low-density or isolated environments (like the Stanford twin study’s non-local setup) where the “screening” mechanism might be weaker.

4. Formalize the Observer. Use Integrated Information Theory (or a variant) to quantify the “observer” capability of physical systems.

5. Accept Incompleteness. Acknowledge that the theory will always be an effective theory, open to new information. The goal is maximal coherence, not final completeness.

The universe is not a machine; it is a self-reading text. We are the interpretants. The circularity is the story telling itself.

[

journals.uchicago.edu

Generalism and the Metaphysics of Ontic Structural Realism | The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science: Vol 71, No 2

Opens in a new window](https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1093/bjps/axy008)[

researchgate.net

Is There a Compelling Argument for Ontic Structural Realism? - ResearchGate

Opens in a new window](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259709951_Is_There_a_Compelling_Argument_for_Ontic_Structural_Realism)[

plato.stanford.edu

Structural Realism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Opens in a new window](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/structural-realism/)[

philsci-archive.pitt.edu

The modal nature of structures in ontic structural realism - PhilSci-Archive

Opens in a new window](https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/4459/1/Esfeld-Modal-Structures0209.pdf)[

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Quantum entanglement dynamics of spacetime and matter - PMC - PubMed Central

Opens in a new window](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12167907/)[

theory.uchicago.edu

SPACETIME FROM ENTANGLEMENT - journal club notes - - Particle Theory

Opens in a new window](https://theory.uchicago.edu/~ejm/course/JournalClub/spacetime-from-entanglement.pdf)[

philsci-archive.pitt.edu

From Ontic Structural Realism to Metaphysical Coherentism - PhilSci-Archive

Opens in a new window](https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/15063/1/From%20Ontic%20Structuralism%20to%20Metaphysical%20Coherentism%20draft%203.pdf)[

reddit.com

Ontic Structural Realism + CoherenceTheory of Truth = Good Scientific Theories are Genuinely True? : r/PhilosophyofScience - Reddit

Opens in a new window](https://www.reddit.com/r/PhilosophyofScience/comments/1e4uats/ontic_structural_realism_coherencetheory_of_truth/)[

kavlifoundation.org

How Spacetime is built by Quantum Entanglement: New Insight into… - Kavli Foundation

Opens in a new window](https://www.kavlifoundation.org/news/how-spacetime-built-quantum-entanglement-new-insight-unification-general-relativity-and)[

youtube.com

Entanglement as the Glue of Spacetime - YouTube

Opens in a new window](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxY1PK4wW1I)[

arxiv.org

A SIGN LANGUAGE FOR QUANTUM MECHANICS Prashant Abstract Semiotics is the language of signs which has been u - arXiv

Opens in a new window](https://arxiv.org/vc/physics/papers/0605/0605099v1.pdf)[

en.wikipedia.org

Semiotic theory of Charles Sanders Peirce - Wikipedia

Opens in a new window](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiotic_theory_of_Charles_Sanders_Peirce)[

brill.com

Chapter 3 Logic of Relatives and Semiotics in Peirce. From the “Subject-Predicate” Inferential Structure to the Synechistic Topology of Interpretation in - Brill

Opens in a new window](https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004347786/B9789004347786_005.xml?language=en)[

en.wikipedia.org

Charles Sanders Peirce - Wikipedia

Opens in a new window](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Sanders_Peirce)[

plato.stanford.edu

Peirce’s Theory of Signs - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Opens in a new window](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce-semiotics/)[

jfsowa.com

Peirce’s Theory of Signs1 - John Sowa

Opens in a new window](http://www.jfsowa.com/ikl/Zeman77.pdf)[

zygonjournal.org

THE MAGICIAN IN THE WORLD: BECOMING, CREATIVITY, AND TRANSVERSAL COMMUNICATION by Inna Semetsky

Opens in a new window](https://www.zygonjournal.org/article/13690/galley/27757/download/)[

worldscientific.com

Chapter 9: The Universality of the Irreducible Triadic Relation - World Scientific Publishing

Opens in a new window](https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/9781848166615_0009)[

academic.oup.com

Constraining the Compression: Thermodynamic Depth and Composition - Oxford Academic

Opens in a new window](https://academic.oup.com/pq/article/75/2/396/7612581)[

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Information and Knowledge in Biology: Time for Reappraisal - PMC - PubMed Central

Opens in a new window](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2633901/)[

mdpi.com

Complexity and Dynamical Depth - MDPI

Opens in a new window](https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/5/3/404)[

esd.copernicus.org

Thermodynamic dissipation theory for the origin of life - ESD

Opens in a new window](https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/2/37/2011/esd-2-37-2011.pdf)[

researchgate.net

(PDF) How Oriented Causation Is Rooted into Thermodynamics - ResearchGate

Opens in a new window](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376771778_How_Oriented_Causation_Is_Rooted_into_Thermodynamics)[

pure.uva.nl

Computational Depth of Infinite Strings Revisited - UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Opens in a new window](https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/49823566/Computational_Depth_of_Infinite_Strings_Revisited.pdf)[

cstheory.stackexchange.com

Are there Conservation Laws in Complexity Theory?

Opens in a new window](https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/3062/are-there-conservation-laws-in-complexity-theory)[

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Structural complexity and configurational entropy of crystals - PubMed

Opens in a new window](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27048729/)[

researchgate.net

(PDF) Structural complexity and configurational entropy of crystals - ResearchGate

Opens in a new window](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296472690_Structural_complexity_and_configurational_entropy_of_crystals)[

en.wikipedia.org

No-hiding theorem - Wikipedia

Opens in a new window](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-hiding_theorem)[

reddit.com

Is the conservation of information necessary? : r/AskPhysics - Reddit

Opens in a new window](https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/nrpdwn/is_the_conservation_of_information_necessary/)[

van.physics.illinois.edu

Quantum Information Conservation | Physics Van - University of Illinois

Opens in a new window](https://van.physics.illinois.edu/ask/listing/24045)[

arxiv.org

[2511.19156] Information Physics of Intelligence: Unifying Logical Depth and Entropy under Thermodynamic Constraints - arXiv

Opens in a new window](https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.19156)[

arxiv.org

Information Physics of Intelligence: Unifying Logical Depth and Entropy under Thermodynamic Constraints - arXiv

Opens in a new window](https://arxiv.org/html/2511.19156)[

researchgate.net

Coherence entropy during propagation through complex media - ResearchGate

Opens in a new window](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382376248_Coherence_entropy_during_propagation_through_complex_media)[

spiedigitallibrary.org

Coherence entropy during propagation through complex media - SPIE Digital Library

Opens in a new window](https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/advanced-photonics/volume-6/issue-4/046002/Coherence-entropy-during-propagation-through-complex-media/10.1117/1.AP.6.4.046002.full)[

en.wikipedia.org

Consciousness causes collapse - Wikipedia

Opens in a new window](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness_causes_collapse)[

plato.stanford.edu

Philosophical Issues in Quantum Theory - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Opens in a new window](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-issues/)[

reddit.com

Just came across the Von-Neumann Wigner interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and I’m curious to hear your thoughts on it. : r/AskPhysics - Reddit

Opens in a new window](https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/1350k3v/just_came_across_the_vonneumann_wigner/)[

quantamagazine.org

Physics Experiments Spell Doom for Quantum ‘Collapse’ Theory | Quanta Magazine

Opens in a new window](https://www.quantamagazine.org/physics-experiments-spell-doom-for-quantum-collapse-theory-20221020/)[

neuroquantology.com

Shaban Aslam, Imported Consciousness and the Law of Resonance - Neuroquantology

Opens in a new window](https://www.neuroquantology.com/media/article_pdfs/Imported_Consciousness_and_the_Law_of_Resonance.pdf)[

scivisionpub.com

Love, Consciousness, Energy, and Matter: The Heart’s Vital Role in Coherence and Creation - SciVision Publishers

Opens in a new window](https://www.scivisionpub.com/articles/love-consciousness-energy-and-matter-the-hearts-vital-role-in-coherence-and-creation-3234.html)[

en.wikipedia.org

Integrated information theory - Wikipedia

Opens in a new window](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_information_theory)[

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

The Problem with Phi: A Critique of Integrated Information Theory - PMC - PubMed Central

Opens in a new window](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4574706/)[

iep.utm.edu

Integrated Information Theory of Consciousness | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Opens in a new window](https://iep.utm.edu/integrated-information-theory-of-consciousness/)[

academic.oup.com

A quantum microtubule substrate of consciousness is experimentally supported and solves the binding and epiphenomenalism problems - Oxford Academic

Opens in a new window](https://academic.oup.com/nc/article/2025/1/niaf011/8127081)[

iai.tv

Consciousness is the collapse of the wave function - IAI TV

Opens in a new window](https://iai.tv/articles/consciousness-is-the-collapse-of-the-wave-function-auid-2120)[

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Evidence of quantum-entangled higher states of consciousness - PMC - PubMed Central

Opens in a new window](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11960655/)[

scottaaronson.blog

Interpretive cards (MWI, Bohm, Copenhagen: collect ‘em all) - Shtetl-Optimized

Opens in a new window](https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=3628)[

plato.stanford.edu

Quantum-Bayesian and Pragmatist Views of Quantum Theory - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Opens in a new window](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/quantum-bayesian/)[

quantumzeitgeist.com

From Cybernetics To Machine Learning: The Evolution Of Self-Regulating Systems

Opens in a new window](https://quantumzeitgeist.com/from-cybernetics-to-machine-learning-the-evolution-of-self-regulating-systems/)[

en.wikipedia.org

Second-order cybernetics - Wikipedia

Opens in a new window](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-order_cybernetics)[

nomads.usp.br

Second Order Cybernetics draft - :: NOMADS :: USP

Opens in a new window](http://www.nomads.usp.br/pesquisas/design/objetos_interativos/arquivos/restrito/SecondOrderCyberneticsdraft.pdf)[

papiro.unizar.es

Niklas Luhmann and Cybernetics - Papiro

Opens in a new window](https://papiro.unizar.es/ojs/index.php/rc51-jos/article/download/790/721/1743)[

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH

Opens in a new window](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11503024/)[

news.northeastern.edu

Researchers find the tipping point between resilience and collapse in complex systems

Opens in a new window](https://news.northeastern.edu/2016/02/17/researchers-find-the-tipping-point-between-resilience-and-collapse-in-complex-systems/)[

gce-lter.marsci.uga.edu

REVIEW - Anticipating Critical Transitions

Opens in a new window](https://gce-lter.marsci.uga.edu/public/uploads/Scheffer_et_al._2012_20161205T153209.pdf)[

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Harnessing tipping points in complex ecological networks - PMC - NIH

Opens in a new window](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6769319/)[

researchgate.net

The link of Heart Rate Variability (HRV) with Time and Space from a quantum perspective

Opens in a new window](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384633737_The_link_of_Heart_Rate_Variability_HRV_with_Time_and_Space_from_a_quantum_perspective)[

en.wikipedia.org

Gödel’s incompleteness theorems - Wikipedia

Opens in a new window](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems)[

reddit.com

Gödel’s theorem debunks the most important AI myth. AI will not be conscious | Roger Penrose (Nobel) : r/artificial - Reddit

Opens in a new window](https://www.reddit.com/r/artificial/comments/1jj8i9n/g%C3%B6dels_theorem_debunks_the_most_important_ai_myth/)[

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Self-improvement in a complex cybernetic system and its implications for biology - PubMed

Opens in a new window](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6410634/)[

eprints.whiterose.ac.uk

Compatibility of the chameleon-field model with fifth-force experiments, cosmology, and PVLAS and CAST results - White Rose Research Online

Opens in a new window](https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/121587/1/0703243v2.pdf)[

wintherscoming.no

Chameleon Models with Field-dependent Couplings - Hans A. Winther

Opens in a new window](https://www.wintherscoming.no/files/master_thesis_winther.pdf)[

mdpi.com

Screened Scalar Fields in the Laboratory and the Solar System - MDPI

Opens in a new window](https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1997/10/7/297)[

preprints.org

Effective Biological Alpha: Unifying the Fine-Structure Constant α and Life as an Electromagnetic Phenomenon - Preprints.org

Opens in a new window](https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202511.0109)[

als.lbl.gov

Mapping the Quantum Landscape of Electrons in Solids - Advanced Light Source

Opens in a new window](https://als.lbl.gov/mapping-the-quantum-landscape-of-electrons-in-solids/)

[

Opens in a new window](https://www.johnsymons.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Reconciling-Ontic-Structural-Realism-and-Ontological-EmergenceFFinal.pdf)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fh-hXMhg4Cg)[

Opens in a new window](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/398822871_Drawing_the_semiotic_object_out_of_nothingness_a_diagrammatic_investigation_into_the_irreducible_triadic_relation_of_discrimination)[

Opens in a new window](https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/bitstream/2433/143046/1/2010-08_GCOE_Rev_Edu_049.pdf)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/peirces-theory-of-signs/objects-and-interpretants/261D257F041961621EC1415B76DD3247)[

Opens in a new window](https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.01682)[

Opens in a new window](https://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/publications/2124)[

Opens in a new window](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2198832/)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.sidc.be/users/evarob/Literature/Papers/Various/self%20organizing%20systems.htm)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.preprints.org/frontend/manuscript/d3d9f4592a52f2c8d92ec427e7529e3c/download_pub)[

Opens in a new window](https://startupsgurukul.com/blog/2024/05/15/from-entropy-to-emergence-understanding-energy-conservations-role-in-complex-systems/)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/17/12/7857)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397934690_Information_Physics_of_Intelligence_Unifying_Logical_Depth_and_Entropy_under_Thermodynamic_Constraints)[

Opens in a new window](https://kk.org/thetechnium/the-arc-of-comp/)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/23/6/650)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2025.1512724/full)[

Opens in a new window](https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.08346)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Coherence-cost-for-violating-conservation-laws-Tajima-Shiraishi/b3818e477816932c792d6dc12d0b53995626fe0a)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.hri.res.in/~libweb/theses/softcopy/uttam-singh-phy.pdf)[

Opens in a new window](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.00708)[

Opens in a new window](https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.04076)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/27/9/925)[

Opens in a new window](https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/721288/are-complexity-and-disorder-correlated-in-entropy)[

Opens in a new window](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8001598/)[

Opens in a new window](https://terra-docs.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/IJHSR/Articles/volume5-issue2/IJHSR_2023_52_p29.pdf)[

Opens in a new window](https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/295370/the-von-neumann-wigner-interpretation-as-the-explanation-for-the-fine-tuning-pro)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.reddit.com/r/Physics/comments/e3vgpf/qbism_an_interesting_qm_interpretation_that/)[

Opens in a new window](http://www.haraldwiltsche.com/uploads/5/0/4/6/50464133/berghoferwiltsche_introduction.pdf)[

Opens in a new window](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20369898)[

Opens in a new window](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation)[

Opens in a new window](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-manyworlds/)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/qu20le/what_are_some_strong_arguments_against_the_many/)[

Opens in a new window](https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/536522/how-does-many-worlds-interpretation-work-for-non-50-50-probabilities)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/4xyeZkgYY6BF4BG5N/link-the-wrong-objections-to-the-many-worlds-interpretation)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/stapp/)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.reddit.com/r/philosophy/comments/326qyf/henry_stapp_quantum_not_classical_physics/)[

Opens in a new window](https://mjdquantum.uk/stappr.html)[

Opens in a new window](https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rstb/article/360/1458/1309/20554/Quantum-physics-in-neuroscience-and-psychology-a)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.reddit.com/r/consciousness/comments/u3ysey/henry_stapp_on_quantum_mechanics_and_human/)[

Opens in a new window](https://tuhat.helsinki.fi/ws/portalfiles/portal/525210798/2025_Pylkkanen_Malmberg_Consciousness_and_Measurement.pdf)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.scielo.br/j/man/a/v64JXgBycsGVL8TpwGVFZwc/?lang=en)[

Opens in a new window](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2105.02314)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.essentiafoundation.org/has-experimental-psychology-proven-that-consciousness-causes-the-collapse-of-the-wave-function/reading/)[

Opens in a new window](https://forums.fqxi.org/d/3885-33-testing-consciousness-causes-collapse-an-interview-with-kelvin-mcqueen)[

Opens in a new window](https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/14299/1/ConCSL16.pdf)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.reddit.com/r/IsaacArthur/comments/1kykv82/an_ai_collapse_the_wavefunction_a_test_of/)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/13/11/961)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/57569/ssoar-2016-grinin_et_al-The_Cybernetic_Revolution_and_the.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.reddit.com/r/learnmath/comments/1jnvj8q/i_need_help_understanding_godels_incompleteness/)[

Opens in a new window](https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/31726/can-g%C3%B6dels-incompleteness-theorems-be-applied-to-ethics)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.quora.com/How-does-G%C3%B6dels-incompleteness-theorem-relate-to-self-referential-paradoxes)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/13/2/119)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235251005_Second-order_Cybernetics_An_Historical_Introduction)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.pangaro.com/glanville/Glanville-SECOND_ORDER_CYBERNETICS.pdf)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.socrethics.com/Folder2/Philosophy-as-Therapy.htm)[

Opens in a new window](https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/7777/1/The_nature_and_dynamics_of_change_-_a_systems_approach_to_exploring_organisational_change.pdf)[

Opens in a new window](https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10099741/1/out.pdf)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/16130840_Beyond_homeostasis_toward_a_concept_of_coherence)[

Opens in a new window](https://hmakse.ccny.cuny.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/s42254-023-00676-y-compressed.pdf.pdf)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/02/160217180253.htm)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/19-128_713ec822-3683-4f70-9ac0-c0bbb28a5a33.pdf)[

Opens in a new window](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12731846/)[

Opens in a new window](https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/6432/1/Waiting%20for%20Carnot.pdf)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/12/3/528)[

Opens in a new window](https://muse.jhu.edu/book/84731/epub)[

Opens in a new window](https://d-nb.info/1246594781/34)[

Opens in a new window](https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2025/12/science-medicine-engineering-innovations-space-medical-breakthroughs)[

Opens in a new window](https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2025/04/cardiac-cardiovascular-fibrosis-research-study-treatment)[

Opens in a new window](https://consciousness.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/2025-06/Program-Abstracts-june9_0.pdf)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/love-consciousness-energy-and-matter-the-hearts-vital-role-in-coherence-and-creation-3234.pdf)[

Opens in a new window](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5856913/)[

Opens in a new window](https://arxiv.org/html/2405.14638v1)[

Opens in a new window](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00298)[

Opens in a new window](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11597748/)[

Opens in a new window](https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.2022.0200)[

Opens in a new window](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.mdpi.com/2624-960X/5/1/7)[

Opens in a new window](https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/63811/is-the-universe-fundamentally-deterministic)[

Opens in a new window](https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsta/article/376/2123/20170316/115640/The-quantum-theory-of-time-the-block-universe-and)[

Opens in a new window](https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-rewrite-a-quantum-rule-that-clashes-with-our-universe-20220926/)[

Opens in a new window](https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/305602/conservation-of-information-and-determinism)

Canonical Hub: CANONICAL_INDEX