UNIFIED_COHERENCE - CKG Quality Scores
Analysis Date: 2026-02-17 Papers Analyzed: 19 (of 24) Average Score: 38.9/100 (6.58/9.0)
Ring 2 — Canonical Grounding
Ring 3 — Framework Connections
📊 Overall Assessment
Series Status: GOOD - Strong foundation papers, some development needed
Score Distribution:
- ✅ Exceptional (100+): 2 papers
- ✅ High Quality (60+): 2 papers
- ⚠️ Moderate (30-59): 7 papers
- 📝 Needs Work (0-29): 8 papers
🏆 Top Performers
-
Trans-Domain Structural Invariants → 145/100 (7.5/9.0)
- Exceptional cross-domain analysis
- Strong structural foundations
-
PHILOSOPHICAL AMMUNITION → 140/100 (7.5/9.0)
- Comprehensive philosophical framework
- Excellent integration
-
MASTER_SYNTHESIS_Psychology → 65/100 (8.0/9.0)
- Strong synthesis work
- Good epistemic structure
-
The_Coherence_Metric_Manifesto → 65/100 (8.25/9.0)
- Well-structured manifesto
- Clear propositions
-
EMPIRICAL_CASE → 45/100 (7.5/9.0)
- Good empirical foundations
- Needs more evidence
💡 Papers Ready for Publication
Exceptional Quality (140+):
- Trans-Domain Structural Invariants
- PHILOSOPHICAL AMMUNITION
High Quality (60+):
- MASTER_SYNTHESIS_Psychology
- The_Coherence_Metric_Manifesto
⚠️ Papers Needing Development
Moderate (30-45):
- UNIFIED_COHERENCE_FRAMEWORK (45/100)
- Gemini_Research_Notes (45/100)
- INDEX (35/100)
- TRANS_DOMAIN_NEXUS (35/100)
- DRAFT_Psychology_Paper (30/100)
Low Scores (0-20):
- Research notes and communication logs
- Need expansion into full papers
💡 Recommendations
Immediate Actions:
- Polish the two exceptional papers (145/100, 140/100) for publication
- Complete evidence sections in moderate papers
- Convert research notes into structured papers
Series Strengths:
- Strong cross-domain analysis
- Good philosophical foundations
- Excellent synthesis work
📁 Full Data
Location: MAIN_PAPERS/OpenAI_DATA/
CSV Export: CKG_Comparison_20260217_144806.csv
Publication-Ready Papers: 4 Papers Needing Revision: 7 Research Notes/Drafts: 8
Canonical Hub: CANONICAL_INDEX