Candidate Identifications (Quarantine)
These are bold bridge claims (ID-style). None are canonical.
ID-CAND-001: Hoffman conscious-agent network = χ (Logos field network)
- Status: candidate
- Risk: depends on whether χ is defined as conscious substrate vs informational substrate.
ID-CAND-002: IIT Φ = Theophysics χ (or χ-functional)
- Status: candidate
- Risk: Φ is defined as irreducible cause-effect structure; χ in-vault currently means “Logos field”/coherence (multiple senses).
- Safer alternative: Φ is an operational proxy/measure of a χ-defined coherence functional.
ID-CAND-003: Bohm “active information” = Theophysics “grace”
- Status: candidate
- Risk: Bohm’s active information is not necessarily “external”; grace in-vault is external control input. Might be analogy, not identity.
ID-CAND-004: CTMU SCSPL = Theophysics self-grounding Logos (meta-level)
- Status: candidate
- Risk: CTMU is a full metaphysical package; only adopt if you want its commitments.
ID-CAND-005: Hartman value calculus = coherence-morality identity bridge
- Status: candidate
- Risk: coherence might not reproduce Hartman’s systemic/extrinsic/intrinsic hierarchy without extra structure.