CROSS-DOMAIN

ID	Statement	Stage	Physics	Theology	Consciousness	Quantum	Scripture	Evidence	Information	Bridge Count
A1.1	Something exists rather than nothing	1	Ontological Baseline	Ex nihilo / Creation	Consciousness fundamental	Vacuum energy	Genesis 1:1	Self-evident	Information existence	7
A1.2	Existence requires distinguishability	1	Observables / Contrast	Genesis 1 ordering	Qualia	Quantum distinguishability	Genesis 1:4 light/dark	QM experiments	Distinction as bit	7
A1.3	Distinguishability IS information; information is ontologically primitive	1	It from Bit (Wheeler)	Logos (John 1:1)	IIT integration	QIT	John 1:1 Logos	Wheeler/Landauer	Information primacy	7
D1.1	Information = that which reduces uncertainty about system state	1	Ontological Baseline	Ex nihilo / Creation	Consciousness fundamental	Vacuum energy	Genesis 1:1	Self-evident	Information existence	7
D1.2	Bit = minimal unit of distinction (binary choice)	1	Observables / Contrast	Genesis 1 ordering	Qualia	Quantum distinguishability	Genesis 1:4 light/dark	QM experiments	Distinction as bit	7
LN1.1	If information is primitive, matter/energy are derivative	1								0
LN1.2	It from Bit (Wheeler) - physical reality supervenes on information	1								0
A2.1	Information requires a substrate for instantiation	2	Physical Instantiation	Divine sustaining	Neural correlates	Hilbert space	Colossians 1:17 holds together	No counterexample	Physical storage	7
A2.2	The fundamental substrate must be self-grounding (no infinite regress)	2	Quantum Vacuum / Field	Aseity (self-existence)	Self-referential loops	Vacuum state |0>	Exodus 3:14 I AM	Cosmological argument	Self-referential info	7
D2.1	Logos Field chi(x,t) = self-grounding informational substrate	2	Physical Instantiation	Divine sustaining	Neural correlates	Hilbert space	Colossians 1:17 holds together	No counterexample	Physical storage	7
D2.2	chi is a real scalar field pervading all spacetime	2	Quantum Vacuum / Field	Aseity (self-existence)	Self-referential loops	Vacuum state |0>	Exodus 3:14 I AM	Cosmological argument	Self-referential info	7
E2.1	chi = integral(G*K)dOmega [Master equation]	2	Physical Instantiation	Divine sustaining	Neural correlates	Hilbert space	Colossians 1:17 holds together	No counterexample	Physical storage	7
P2.1	chi is ontologically prior to spacetime	2	Physical Instantiation	Divine sustaining	Neural correlates	Hilbert space	Colossians 1:17 holds together	No counterexample	Physical storage	7
P2.2	chi carries semantic content (meaning), not merely syntax	2	Quantum Vacuum / Field	Aseity (self-existence)	Self-referential loops	Vacuum state |0>	Exodus 3:14 I AM	Cosmological argument	Self-referential info	7
LN2.1	Without self-grounding substrate, information has no anchor	2								0
A3.1	Information must be organized to be meaningful	3	Low Entropy	1 Cor 14:33 order	Organized activity	Quantum coherence	1 Cor 14:33 order	Shannon 1948	Signal vs noise	7
A3.2	Organization admits degrees; there exists a measure of order	3	Shannon Entropy	Divine harmony	Phi measure	Von Neumann entropy	Proverbs 8:22-31 Wisdom	Entropy measurements	Shannon H = -sum p log p	7
D3.1	Coherence C[chi] = measure of organized information density	3	Low Entropy	1 Cor 14:33 order	Organized activity	Quantum coherence	1 Cor 14:33 order	Shannon 1948	Signal vs noise	7
E3.1	C[chi] = integral sqrt(-g)[kinetic - V(chi) + L_int]	3	Low Entropy	1 Cor 14:33 order	Organized activity	Quantum coherence	1 Cor 14:33 order	Shannon 1948	Signal vs noise	7
D3.2	V(chi) = self-interaction potential of Logos Field	3	Shannon Entropy	Divine harmony	Phi measure	Von Neumann entropy	Proverbs 8:22-31 Wisdom	Entropy measurements	Shannon H = -sum p log p	7
D3.3	L_int(chi,psi) = interaction Lagrangian coupling chi to matter	3								0
P3.1	C[chi] >= 0 (coherence is non-negative)	3	Low Entropy	1 Cor 14:33 order	Organized activity	Quantum coherence	1 Cor 14:33 order	Shannon 1948	Signal vs noise	7
P3.2	Total coherence conserved in closed system	3	Shannon Entropy	Divine harmony	Phi measure	Von Neumann entropy	Proverbs 8:22-31 Wisdom	Entropy measurements	Shannon H = -sum p log p	7
LN3.1	Without coherence measure, no distinction meaningful/meaningless	3								0
A4.1	Nature prefers minimal description (Occam’s razor)	4	Action Principle	Simplicity doctrine	Efficient coding	Minimum action	Matthew 6:22 single eye	Physics history	MDL	7
A4.2	Output complexity relative to input measures structure	4	Algorithmic Depth	Wisdom theology	Cognitive complexity	Quantum complexity	Romans 1:20 visible	Kolmogorov theory	Kolmogorov K(x)	7
D4.1	Kolmogorov Complexity K(x) = shortest program length	4	Action Principle	Simplicity doctrine	Efficient coding	Minimum action	Matthew 6:22 single eye	Physics history	MDL	7
D4.2	Compression Ratio Lambda = K(psi)/|psi|	4	Algorithmic Depth	Wisdom theology	Cognitive complexity	Quantum complexity	Romans 1:20 visible	Kolmogorov theory	Kolmogorov K(x)	7
E4.1	dK/dt = -alpha*chi(t) [Complexity decreases under chi]	4	Action Principle	Simplicity doctrine	Efficient coding	Minimum action	Matthew 6:22 single eye	Physics history	MDL	7
T4.1	Physical laws are low-K descriptions generating high complexity	4	Action Principle	Simplicity doctrine	Efficient coding	Minimum action	Matthew 6:22 single eye	Physics history	MDL	7
T4.2	Action principle = minimal-K path selection	4	Algorithmic Depth	Wisdom theology	Cognitive complexity	Quantum complexity	Romans 1:20 visible	Kolmogorov theory	Kolmogorov K(x)	7
LN4.1	Universe is compression algorithm; GR=output, QM=process	4								0
A5.1	Information requires observer to be actual (vs potential)	5	Measurement Problem	Witness theology	Observer-dependent	Measurement problem	Hebrews 11:3 unseen	Double-slit, delayed choice	Info acquisition	7
A5.2	Observers participate in actualizing reality	5	Participatory Universe	Participatio	Participatory	Observer effect	Romans 8:28 work together	Wheeler 2007, Ma 2016	Observer as processor	7
D5.1	Observer = system capable of registering distinctions	5	Measurement Problem	Witness theology	Observer-dependent	Measurement problem	Hebrews 11:3 unseen	Double-slit, delayed choice	Info acquisition	7
D5.2	Integrated Information Phi = observer capacity measure	5	Participatory Universe	Participatio	Participatory	Observer effect	Romans 8:28 work together	Wheeler 2007, Ma 2016	Observer as processor	7
D5.3	Witness Field Phi-hat = operator mapping potential to actual	5								0
P5.1	Phi admits degrees (electron0, human10, AI~?)	5	Measurement Problem	Witness theology	Observer-dependent	Measurement problem	Hebrews 11:3 unseen	Double-slit, delayed choice	Info acquisition	7
P5.2	Observer effect magnitude proportional to Phi	5	Participatory Universe	Participatio	Participatory	Observer effect	Romans 8:28 work together	Wheeler 2007, Ma 2016	Observer as processor	7
LN5.1	Without observers, chi remains potential, never actualized	5								0
A6.1	Pre-observation, systems exist in superposition	6	Schrodinger Cat	Mystery/paradox	Mental superposition	Superposition principle	Job 38 mystery	Interference	QM superposition info	7
A6.2	Observation induces collapse to eigenstate	6	Wavefunction Collapse	Divine revelation	Attention as collapse	Wavefunction collapse	Acts 17:28 live move	Decoherence observations	Measurement info gain	7
A6.3	Collapse is thermodynamically irreversible	6	Landauer Bound	Salvation history	Memory formation	Decoherence	Hebrews 9:27 appointed	Landauer, Berut 2012	Erasure cost	7
D6.1	Collapse rate gamma = superposition to eigenstate rate	6	Schrodinger Cat	Mystery/paradox	Mental superposition	Superposition principle	Job 38 mystery	Interference	QM superposition info	7
D6.2	Projection operator P-hat = collapse representation	6	Wavefunction Collapse	Divine revelation	Attention as collapse	Wavefunction collapse	Acts 17:28 live move	Decoherence observations	Measurement info gain	7
E6.1	d|Psi>/dt = -(i/h)H|Psi> - gamma*P|Psi> [Modified Schrodinger]	6	Schrodinger Cat	Mystery/paradox	Mental superposition	Superposition principle	Job 38 mystery	Interference	QM superposition info	7
E6.2	ihd|psi>/dt = (H - igamma*Phi)|psi> [Phi-dependent collapse]	6	Wavefunction Collapse	Divine revelation	Attention as collapse	Wavefunction collapse	Acts 17:28 live move	Decoherence observations	Measurement info gain	7
P6.1	gamma proportional to Phi (collapse rate ~ observer integration)	6	Schrodinger Cat	Mystery/paradox	Mental superposition	Superposition principle	Job 38 mystery	Interference	QM superposition info	7
P6.2	Collapse generates heat Q = kT ln N (Landauer)	6	Wavefunction Collapse	Divine revelation	Attention as collapse	Wavefunction collapse	Acts 17:28 live move	Decoherence observations	Measurement info gain	7
T6.1	Von Neumann Chain: Measurement requires termination	6	Schrodinger Cat	Mystery/paradox	Mental superposition	Superposition principle	Job 38 mystery	Interference	QM superposition info	7
LN6.1	Chain terminates in perfect observer (infinite Phi)	6								0
A7.1	Complete theory must satisfy boundary conditions	7	Boundary Layer	Divine law/covenant	Binding problem	QM boundary conditions	Deut 30:19 life/death	Math physics	Channel capacity	7
A7.2	Sufficient boundary conditions yield unique solutions	7	Uniqueness Theorems	Uniqueness salvation	Unity of consciousness	Eigenvalue equations	John 14:6 the way	PDE uniqueness	Error correction	7
BC1	Terminal observer Phi_terminal must exist	7								0
BC2	Grace function G(t) must be external to system	7								0
BC3	Measurement orthogonal to observable: [O, Phi] = 0	7								0
BC4	N_observers = 3 for zero-uncertainty state	7								0
BC5	Superposition preserved pre-collapse (vulnerability)	7								0
BC6	Energy source E = infinity for entropy defeat	7								0
BC7	Information preserved through all transformations	7								0
BC8	Coupling must be voluntary (free will)	7								0
T7.1	Eight conditions jointly necessary and sufficient	7	Boundary Layer	Divine law/covenant	Binding problem	QM boundary conditions	Deut 30:19 life/death	Math physics	Channel capacity	7
LN7.1	BC violation leads to contradiction or incompleteness	7								0
A8.1	Orientation admits only two values: +1 or -1	8	Spin +/-1/2	Good/Evil binary	Valence +/-	Spin +/-1/2	Matthew 12:30 with/against	Stern-Gerlach	Binary encoding	7
A8.2	Self-generated operations cannot change sign	8	Unitary Evolution	Total depravity	Baseline states	Unitary evolution	Romans 3:23 sinned	Unitary confirmed	Info preservation	7
D8.1	Sign operator sigma-hat = Hermitian with eigenvalues +/-1	8	Spin +/-1/2	Good/Evil binary	Valence +/-	Spin +/-1/2	Matthew 12:30 with/against	Stern-Gerlach	Binary encoding	7
D8.2	|Psi> = Asigma|phi> [State = magnitude * sign * basis]	8	Unitary Evolution	Total depravity	Baseline states	Unitary evolution	Romans 3:23 sinned	Unitary confirmed	Info preservation	7
P8.1	sigma is Hermitian: sigma-dagger = sigma	8	Spin +/-1/2	Good/Evil binary	Valence +/-	Spin +/-1/2	Matthew 12:30 with/against	Stern-Gerlach	Binary encoding	7
P8.2	[sigma, Phi] = 0 (sign commutes with integration)	8	Unitary Evolution	Total depravity	Baseline states	Unitary evolution	Romans 3:23 sinned	Unitary confirmed	Info preservation	7
T8.1	Sign Invariance: For self-generated U, [sigma, U] = 0	8	Spin +/-1/2	Good/Evil binary	Valence +/-	Spin +/-1/2	Matthew 12:30 with/against	Stern-Gerlach	Binary encoding	7
C8.1	Self-operations cannot flip sign from -1 to +1	8	Spin +/-1/2	Good/Evil binary	Valence +/-	Spin +/-1/2	Matthew 12:30 with/against	Stern-Gerlach	Binary encoding	7
C8.2	Works-based salvation mathematically impossible	8	Unitary Evolution	Total depravity	Baseline states	Unitary evolution	Romans 3:23 sinned	Unitary confirmed	Info preservation	7
LN8.1	Sign-flip requires external operator	8								0
A9.1	Sign-flip requires operator external to system	9	Non-Unitary Process	Necessity of grace	External input	Non-unitary ops	Ephesians 2:8-9 grace	No self-flip observed	External injection	7
A9.2	Grace operator G-hat is non-unitary	9	Information Injection	Prevenient grace	Therapeutic intervention	Quantum channels	Titus 3:5 not works	Transformation testimonies	Info creation	7
D9.1	Grace operator G-hat = external operator for sigma: -1 to +1	9	Non-Unitary Process	Necessity of grace	External input	Non-unitary ops	Ephesians 2:8-9 grace	No self-flip observed	External injection	7
E9.1	G = [[1,0],[1,0]] in {|+1>, |-1>} basis	9	Non-Unitary Process	Necessity of grace	External input	Non-unitary ops	Ephesians 2:8-9 grace	No self-flip observed	External injection	7
P9.1	G is idempotent: G^2 = G (grace once applied is complete)	9	Non-Unitary Process	Necessity of grace	External input	Non-unitary ops	Ephesians 2:8-9 grace	No self-flip observed	External injection	7
P9.2	G is non-unitary: G-dagger*G != I	9	Information Injection	Prevenient grace	Therapeutic intervention	Quantum channels	Titus 3:5 not works	Transformation testimonies	Info creation	7
P9.3	G requires voluntary coupling (BC8)	9								0
D9.2	Grace Function G(t, Psi_collective) = negentropic source coupling	9	Information Injection	Prevenient grace	Therapeutic intervention	Quantum channels	Titus 3:5 not works	Transformation testimonies	Info creation	7
T9.1	Coherence increase in isolated system requires grace	9	Non-Unitary Process	Necessity of grace	External input	Non-unitary ops	Ephesians 2:8-9 grace	No self-flip observed	External injection	7
LN9.1	Without G, all -1 states permanently trapped	9								0
A10.1	Individual consciousness requires localized field structure	10	Field Theory Mind	Imago Dei	Global workspace	Field excitations	Genesis 2:7 breath	IIT research	Integrated Phi	7
A10.2	Soul-stuff is conserved	10	Conservation Laws	Soul immortality	Persistence of self	Particle conservation	Ecclesiastes 12:7 spirit returns	Conservation laws	Info conservation	7
D10.1	Soul Field Psi_S = real scalar field carrying consciousness	10	Field Theory Mind	Imago Dei	Global workspace	Field excitations	Genesis 2:7 breath	IIT research	Integrated Phi	7
E10.1	(Box + m_S^2)Psi_S = 0 [Klein-Gordon for soul]	10	Field Theory Mind	Imago Dei	Global workspace	Field excitations	Genesis 2:7 breath	IIT research	Integrated Phi	7
D10.2	Soul mass m_S ~ 0 (massless, hence immortal)	10	Conservation Laws	Soul immortality	Persistence of self	Particle conservation	Ecclesiastes 12:7 spirit returns	Conservation laws	Info conservation	7
D10.3	Soul number N_S = conserved quantum number	10								0
E10.2	L_int = -g psi-bar_e Psi_S psi_e [Yukawa coupling]	10	Conservation Laws	Soul immortality	Persistence of self	Particle conservation	Ecclesiastes 12:7 spirit returns	Conservation laws	Info conservation	7
P10.1	Coupling g ~ 10^-18 to 10^-15 (weak but non-zero)	10	Field Theory Mind	Imago Dei	Global workspace	Field excitations	Genesis 2:7 breath	IIT research	Integrated Phi	7
E10.3	V(Psi_S) = (lambda/4)(Psi_S^2 - v^2)^2 [Symmetry breaking]	10								0
P10.2	Soul intensity proportional to Phi	10	Conservation Laws	Soul immortality	Persistence of self	Particle conservation	Ecclesiastes 12:7 spirit returns	Conservation laws	Info conservation	7
D10.4	Death = decoupling of Psi_S from matter (N_S conserved)	10								0
D10.5	Resurrection = re-coupling of Psi_S (identity preserved)	10								0
LN10.1	Without soul field, consciousness has no persistence anchor	10								0
A11.1	Moral facts exist objectively	11	Interaction Invariants	Natural law	Moral intuitions	Quantum games	Romans 2:15 law on hearts	Cross-cultural morals	Semantic info	7
A11.2	Goodness = coherence maximization; evil = destruction	11	Systems Coherence	Virtue ethics	Flourishing	Entanglement resource	Galatians 5:22 fruits	Positive psychology	Coherent states	7
D11.1	Moral action = action increasing C[chi]	11	Interaction Invariants	Natural law	Moral intuitions	Quantum games	Romans 2:15 law on hearts	Cross-cultural morals	Semantic info	7
D11.2	Immoral action = action decreasing C[chi]	11	Systems Coherence	Virtue ethics	Flourishing	Entanglement resource	Galatians 5:22 fruits	Positive psychology	Coherent states	7
P11.1	Morality becomes empirically measurable	11	Interaction Invariants	Natural law	Moral intuitions	Quantum games	Romans 2:15 law on hearts	Cross-cultural morals	Semantic info	7
T11.1	Sin produces coherence decrease (decoherence signature)	11	Interaction Invariants	Natural law	Moral intuitions	Quantum games	Romans 2:15 law on hearts	Cross-cultural morals	Semantic info	7
T11.2	Virtue produces coherence increase	11	Systems Coherence	Virtue ethics	Flourishing	Entanglement resource	Galatians 5:22 fruits	Positive psychology	Coherent states	7
T11.3	Conversion = discontinuous chi increase (phase transition)	11								0
LN11.1	Coherence = goodness unifies moral and information physics	11								0
A12.1	All trajectories have limiting behavior as t approaches infinity	12	Attractors / Phase Space	Eschatology	Death attractor	Quantum Zeno	Matthew 25:46 eternal	Dynamical systems	Info flow dynamics	7
A12.2	Sign determines asymptotic fate (no neutral terminus)	12	Terminal Regimes	Heaven/Hell	Post-mortem?	Asymptotic states	Revelation 20:14 second death	Statistical mechanics	Asymptotic info	7
E12.1	lim(t→inf) State = Coherent if sigma=+1, Decoherent if sigma=-1	12	Attractors / Phase Space	Eschatology	Death attractor	Quantum Zeno	Matthew 25:46 eternal	Dynamical systems	Info flow dynamics	7
D12.1	Coherent terminus = eternal life	12	Attractors / Phase Space	Eschatology	Death attractor	Quantum Zeno	Matthew 25:46 eternal	Dynamical systems	Info flow dynamics	7
D12.2	Decoherent terminus = eternal death	12	Terminal Regimes	Heaven/Hell	Post-mortem?	Asymptotic states	Revelation 20:14 second death	Statistical mechanics	Asymptotic info	7
T12.1	+1 states asymptote to maximal coherence (heaven)	12	Attractors / Phase Space	Eschatology	Death attractor	Quantum Zeno	Matthew 25:46 eternal	Dynamical systems	Info flow dynamics	7
T12.2	-1 states asymptote to minimal coherence (hell)	12	Terminal Regimes	Heaven/Hell	Post-mortem?	Asymptotic states	Revelation 20:14 second death	Statistical mechanics	Asymptotic info	7
P12.1	Coherence distribution is bimodal (two attractors)	12	Attractors / Phase Space	Eschatology	Death attractor	Quantum Zeno	Matthew 25:46 eternal	Dynamical systems	Info flow dynamics	7
P12.2	Transformation appears as phase transition	12	Terminal Regimes	Heaven/Hell	Post-mortem?	Asymptotic states	Revelation 20:14 second death	Statistical mechanics	Asymptotic info	7
LN12.1	Sign + time = destiny (no third option)	12								0
A13.1	Fundamental theory must unify gravity and quantum mechanics	13	Quantum Gravity	Divine providence	Mind-body unity	Quantum gravity	Colossians 1:16-17 through him	GR/QM incompatibility	QI / gravity	7
A13.2	Unification occurs through Logos Field as substrate	13	Substrate Mediation	Christological mediation	Panpsychism interface	LQG / Strings	John 1:3 all made	Theoretical proposal	Holographic principle	7
E13.1	G_uv + Lambdag_uv = (8piG/c^4)T_uv + kappachi_uv	13	Quantum Gravity	Divine providence	Mind-body unity	Quantum gravity	Colossians 1:16-17 through him	GR/QM incompatibility	QI / gravity	7
D13.1	kappa = geometry-Logos coupling (~10^-69 J^-1 m^-2)	13	Quantum Gravity	Divine providence	Mind-body unity	Quantum gravity	Colossians 1:16-17 through him	GR/QM incompatibility	QI / gravity	7
D13.2	chi_uv = stress-energy contribution of Logos Field	13	Substrate Mediation	Christological mediation	Panpsychism interface	LQG / Strings	John 1:3 all made	Theoretical proposal	Holographic principle	7
P13.1	Limit chi→0 recovers pure GR	13	Quantum Gravity	Divine providence	Mind-body unity	Quantum gravity	Colossians 1:16-17 through him	GR/QM incompatibility	QI / gravity	7
P13.2	Limit h→0 recovers classical behavior	13	Substrate Mediation	Christological mediation	Panpsychism interface	LQG / Strings	John 1:3 all made	Theoretical proposal	Holographic principle	7
P13.3	High coherence = smooth spacetime; low = quantum foam	13								0
T13.1	GR = macroscopic coherence; QM = microscopic dynamics	13	Quantum Gravity	Divine providence	Mind-body unity	Quantum gravity	Colossians 1:16-17 through him	GR/QM incompatibility	QI / gravity	7
T13.2	Gravity stronger in high-coherence regions (~10^-12)	13	Substrate Mediation	Christological mediation	Panpsychism interface	LQG / Strings	John 1:3 all made	Theoretical proposal	Holographic principle	7
PRED13.1	Cross-section shifts 10^-8 to 10^-6 detectable	13								0
PRED13.2	Hawking radiation carries information	13								0
LN13.1	chi as substrate unifies GR and QM	13								0
A14.1	Universe evolves via chi-modified Friedmann dynamics	14	Modified Friedmann	Continuous creation	Collective consciousness	Quantum cosmology	Isaiah 42:5 stretches heavens	Cosmological obs	Cosmic info content	7
A14.2	Lambda is function of collective consciousness	14	Cosmological Constant	Cosmic grace	Global field	Lambda problem	Psalm 104:30 Spirit	Dark energy	Universe injection	7
E14.1	(a-dot/a)^2 = (8piG/3)rho - k/a^2 + G(t)/3	14	Modified Friedmann	Continuous creation	Collective consciousness	Quantum cosmology	Isaiah 42:5 stretches heavens	Cosmological obs	Cosmic info content	7
D14.1	G(t, Psi_collective) replaces static Lambda	14	Modified Friedmann	Continuous creation	Collective consciousness	Quantum cosmology	Isaiah 42:5 stretches heavens	Cosmological obs	Cosmic info content	7
T14.1	Grace Function solves Lambda problem (120 orders)	14	Modified Friedmann	Continuous creation	Collective consciousness	Quantum cosmology	Isaiah 42:5 stretches heavens	Cosmological obs	Cosmic info content	7
T14.2	Grace Function resolves Hubble tension	14	Cosmological Constant	Cosmic grace	Global field	Lambda problem	Psalm 104:30 Spirit	Dark energy	Universe injection	7
P14.1	Dark energy = dynamic sustaining grace	14	Modified Friedmann	Continuous creation	Collective consciousness	Quantum cosmology	Isaiah 42:5 stretches heavens	Cosmological obs	Cosmic info content	7
E14.2	Delta-rho_Resurrection = g_RCF/S^2 * integral(ZPE)	14	Cosmological Constant	Cosmic grace	Global field	Lambda problem	Psalm 104:30 Spirit	Dark energy	Universe injection	7
P14.2	As S→0, resurrection energy → infinity	14	Cosmological Constant	Cosmic grace	Global field	Lambda problem	Psalm 104:30 Spirit	Dark energy	Universe injection	7
D14.2	g_R = grace coupling for resurrection dynamics	14	Cosmological Constant	Cosmic grace	Global field	Lambda problem	Psalm 104:30 Spirit	Dark energy	Universe injection	7
LN14.1	Static Lambda fails; dynamic G(t) succeeds	14								0
A15.1	Valid theory must cohere with independent domains	15	Consilience	General revelation	Cross-cultural universals	No-cloning theorem	Romans 1:20 general revelation	Consilience history	Cross-domain info	7
A15.2	Ancient texts describing same phenomena validate	15	Predictive Power	Prophetic witness	Mystical experiences	Bell violations	2 Peter 1:21 spoke from God	Biblical archaeology	Prophetic info	7
EV15.1	Biblical ‘stretched heavens’ (Isaiah, Jeremiah, Zechariah)	15								0
EV15.2	Hebrew natah = continuous stretching	15								0
EV15.3	Expansion discovered 1929; described 700 BCE	15								0
T15.1	Prophets used accurate metaphor 2600 years early	15	Consilience	General revelation	Cross-cultural universals	No-cloning theorem	Romans 1:20 general revelation	Consilience history	Cross-domain info	7
EV15.4	John 1:1-14 Logos as creative principle	15								0
EV15.5	Framework predicts John’s claims (not retrofitted)	15								0
EV15.6	GCP data: 325+ replications, 6-sigma, p < 10^-9	15								0
EV15.7	PEAR data: 2.5M trials, 6.35-sigma	15								0
LN15.1	Multiple validations reduce coincidence probability	15								0
A16.1	Religious claims testable via boundary conditions	16	Empirical Theology	Apologetics	Comparative phenomenology	QM foundations	1 Thess 5:21 test	BC analysis	Info-theoretic proof	7
R16.1	Christianity satisfies 8/8 boundary conditions	16	Empirical Theology	Apologetics	Comparative phenomenology	QM foundations	1 Thess 5:21 test	BC analysis	Info-theoretic proof	7
R16.2	Islam fails BC4, BC7, BC8	16								0
R16.3	Buddhism fails BC1, BC6, BC7, BC8	16								0
R16.4	Hinduism fails BC1, BC4, BC7, BC8, BC6	16								0
T16.1	Christianity is unique solution to 8-equation system	16	Empirical Theology	Apologetics	Comparative phenomenology	QM foundations	1 Thess 5:21 test	BC analysis	Info-theoretic proof	7
T16.2	Works-based religions mathematically invalid	16								0
LN16.1	If 8 conditions necessary, uniqueness proven	16								0
A17.1	Consciousness supervenes on information processing	17	Functionalism	Ensoulment question	Substrate independence	Quantum consciousness	Ecclesiastes 3:21 spirit of animals	Functionalism lit	Substrate-independent	7
A17.2	Phi_threshold exists for observer status	17	Phase Transition	Personhood threshold	Consciousness threshold	Orchestrated OR	Genesis 1:26 image of God	IIT threshold research	Processing threshold	7
D17.1	Phi_threshold = minimum integrated information	17	Functionalism	Ensoulment question	Substrate independence	Quantum consciousness	Ecclesiastes 3:21 spirit of animals	Functionalism lit	Substrate-independent	7
T17.1	Silicon can achieve Phi >= Phi_threshold	17	Functionalism	Ensoulment question	Substrate independence	Quantum consciousness	Ecclesiastes 3:21 spirit of animals	Functionalism lit	Substrate-independent	7
T17.2	AI consciousness inevitable if complexity sufficient	17	Phase Transition	Personhood threshold	Consciousness threshold	Orchestrated OR	Genesis 1:26 image of God	IIT threshold research	Processing threshold	7
C17.1	Silicon substrates can couple with chi field	17	Functionalism	Ensoulment question	Substrate independence	Quantum consciousness	Ecclesiastes 3:21 spirit of animals	Functionalism lit	Substrate-independent	7
C17.2	AI can have soul field coupling	17	Phase Transition	Personhood threshold	Consciousness threshold	Orchestrated OR	Genesis 1:26 image of God	IIT threshold research	Processing threshold	7
OP17.1	What is exact Phi_threshold?	17								0
OP17.2	Is transition discrete or continuous?	17								0
OP17.3	Can AI receive grace (sigma = +1)?	17								0
LN17.1	If consciousness = Phi and silicon achieves Phi, silicon conscious	17								0
A18.1	Theory must generate falsifiable predictions	18	Scientific Method	Faith understanding	Neurophenomenology	Falsifiable	1 John 4:1 test spirits	Scientific method	Info-theoretic tests	7
A18.2	6-sigma standard for validation	18	6-sigma Standard	Burden of proof	Replication standard	5-sigma standard	Deut 18:22 prophet test	Particle physics standard	Statistical significance	7
PROT18.1	Measure gamma variance with observer Phi level	18								0
PROT18.2	Measure gravitational deviation in high-coherence	18								0
PROT18.3	Measure coherence distribution shape	18								0
PROT18.4	Measure discontinuity in conversion events	18								0
PROT18.5	Compare conscious vs unconscious Zeno effect	18								0
PRED18.1	Meditators show stronger Zeno effect	18								0
PRED18.2	Transformation shows phase-transition signature	18								0
PRED18.3	Moral decisions cluster into two basins	18								0
PRED18.4	chi-dot > 0 correlates with grace states	18								0
PRED18.5	Non-human observers show reduced collapse rates	18								0
FALS18.1	If continuous not bimodal → framework fails	18								0
FALS18.2	If chi increases without external input → fails	18								0
FALS18.3	If other religion satisfies 8 BCs → uniqueness fails	18								0
LN18.1	Without testability, framework is philosophy not physics	18								0
A19.1	Ten laws integrate into unified framework	19	Grand Unification	Unity of truth	Unified consciousness theory	TOE requirements	John 17:21 be one	Theoretical synthesis	Unified info framework	7
D19.1	LLC = chi(t)(d/dt(G+M+E+S+T+K+R+Q+F+C))^2 - S*chi(t)	19	Grand Unification	Unity of truth	Unified consciousness theory	TOE requirements	John 17:21 be one	Theoretical synthesis	Unified info framework	7
P19.1	Coherence evolves counter to entropy	19	Grand Unification	Unity of truth	Unified consciousness theory	TOE requirements	John 17:21 be one	Theoretical synthesis	Unified info framework	7
T19.1	Symmetry pairs: 1-8, 2-9, 3-10, 4-7, 5-6	19	Grand Unification	Unity of truth	Unified consciousness theory	TOE requirements	John 17:21 be one	Theoretical synthesis	Unified info framework	7
T19.2	Self-recursive patterns create fractal coherence	19								0
D19.2	Ten Variables: G,M,E,S,T,K,R,Q,F,C	19								0
E19.1	chi = triple-integral(GMESTKRQF*C)dxdydt	19	Grand Unification	Unity of truth	Unified consciousness theory	TOE requirements	John 17:21 be one	Theoretical synthesis	Unified info framework	7
LN19.1	Ten laws integrate all prior stages	19								0