GO Vault

AUDIT_Spine_vs_Sequential

5 min read

Audit: Excel Spine vs Sequential Notes

Generated: 2026-01-15 16:58:52

Summary

  • Excel BASELINE IDs: 193
  • Sequential notes parsed: 188
  • Excel IDs missing a sequential note file: 67
  • Sequential note IDs missing from Excel: 62
  • Unmatched sequential files (naming pattern): 1

Excel IDs missing sequential note files

  • A15.1 ? Valid theory must cohere with independent domains
  • A15.2 ? Ancient texts describing same phenomena validate
  • A16.1 ? Religious claims testable via boundary conditions
  • A18.1 ? Theory must generate falsifiable predictions
  • A18.2 ? 6-sigma standard for validation
  • C17.1 ? Silicon substrates can couple with chi field
  • C17.2 ? AI can have soul field coupling
  • D10.2 ? Soul mass m_S ~ 0 (massless, hence immortal)
  • D10.3 ? Soul number N_S = conserved quantum number
  • D10.4 ? Death = decoupling of Psi_S from matter (N_S conserved)
  • D10.5 ? Resurrection = re-coupling of Psi_S (identity preserved)
  • D11.2 ? Immoral action = action decreasing C[chi]
  • D13.2 ? chi_uv = stress-energy contribution of Logos Field
  • D14.2 ? g_R = grace coupling for resurrection dynamics
  • D8.2 ? |Psi> = Asigma|phi> [State = magnitude * sign * basis]
  • D9.2 ? Grace Function G(t, Psi_collective) = negentropic source coupling
  • E10.2 ? L_int = -g psi-bar_e Psi_S psi_e [Yukawa coupling]
  • E10.3 ? V(Psi_S) = (lambda/4)(Psi_S^2 - v^2)^2 [Symmetry breaking]
  • E14.2 ? Delta-rho_Resurrection = g_RCF/S^2 * integral(ZPE)
  • EV15.5 ? Framework predicts John’s claims (not retrofitted)
  • EV15.6 ? GCP data: 325+ replications, 6-sigma, p < 10
  • EV15.7 ? PEAR data: 2.5M trials, 6.35-sigma
  • LN10.1 ? Without soul field, consciousness has no persistence anchor
  • LN11.1 ? Coherence = goodness unifies moral and information physics
  • LN12.1 ? Sign + time = destiny (no third option)
  • LN13.1 ? chi as substrate unifies GR and QM
  • LN14.1 ? Static Lambda fails; dynamic G(t) succeeds
  • LN15.1 ? Multiple validations reduce coincidence probability
  • LN16.1 ? If 8 conditions necessary, uniqueness proven
  • LN17.1 ? If consciousness = Phi and silicon achieves Phi, silicon conscious
  • LN18.1 ? Without testability, framework is philosophy not physics
  • LN19.1 ? Ten laws integrate all prior stages
  • LN7.1 ? BC violation leads to contradiction or incompleteness
  • LN8.1 ? Sign-flip requires external operator
  • LN9.1 ? Without G, all -1 states permanently trapped
  • OP17.1 ? What is exact Phi_threshold?
  • OP17.2 ? Is transition discrete or continuous?
  • OP17.3 ? Can AI receive grace (sigma = +1)?
  • P11.1 ? Morality becomes empirically measurable
  • P12.1 ? Coherence distribution is bimodal (two attractors)
  • P12.2 ? Transformation appears as phase transition
  • P13.1 ? Limit chi→0 recovers pure GR
  • P13.2 ? Limit h→0 recovers classical behavior
  • P13.3 ? High coherence = smooth spacetime; low = quantum foam
  • P14.1 ? Dark energy = dynamic sustaining grace
  • P14.2 ? As S→0, resurrection energy → infinity
  • P19.1 ? Coherence evolves counter to entropy
  • P8.1 ? sigma is Hermitian: sigma-dagger = sigma
  • P8.2 ? [sigma, Phi] = 0 (sign commutes with integration)
  • PRED13.1 ? Cross-section shifts 10^-8 to 10^-6 detectable
  • PRED13.2 ? Hawking radiation carries information
  • PRED18.3 ? Moral decisions cluster into two basins
  • PRED18.4 ? chi-dot > 0 correlates with grace states
  • PRED18.5 ? Non-human observers show reduced collapse rates
  • R16.1 ? Christianity satisfies 8/8 boundary conditions
  • R16.2 ? Islam fails BC4, BC7, BC8
  • R16.3 ? Buddhism fails BC1, BC6, BC7, BC8
  • R16.4 ? Hinduism fails BC1, BC4, BC7, BC8, BC6
  • T11.3 ? Conversion = discontinuous chi increase (phase transition)
  • T13.2 ? Gravity stronger in high-coherence regions (~10^-12)
  • T14.1 ? Grace Function solves Lambda problem (120 orders)
  • T14.2 ? Grace Function resolves Hubble tension
  • T15.1 ? Prophets used accurate metaphor 2600 years early
  • T17.2 ? AI consciousness inevitable if complexity sufficient
  • T19.2 ? Self-recursive patterns create fractal coherence
  • T7.1 ? Eight conditions jointly necessary and sufficient
  • T9.1 ? Coherence increase in isolated system requires grace

Sequential note IDs missing from Excel

By prefix

  • D19: 8
  • T16: 4
  • EXP5: 2
  • P9: 2
  • BRIDGE-INFO-MIND: 1
  • BRIDGE-PHI-CHI: 1
  • BRIDGE-PHY-THEO: 1
  • E3: 1
  • F1: 1
  • F2: 1
  • F3: 1
  • F4: 1
  • F5: 1
  • F6: 1
  • F7: 1
  • F8: 1
  • F9: 1
  • ID7: 1
  • LAMBDA: 1
  • O1: 1
  • O2: 1
  • O3: 1
  • O4: 1
  • OPEN17: 1
  • P0: 1
  • P1: 1
  • P2: 1
  • P3: 1
  • P4: 1
  • P5: 1
  • PLACEHOLDER-180: 1
  • PLACEHOLDER-181: 1
  • PLACEHOLDER-182: 1
  • PLACEHOLDER-183: 1
  • PLACEHOLDER-184: 1
  • PLACEHOLDER-185: 1
  • PLACEHOLDER-186: 1
  • PLACEHOLDER-187: 1
  • PLACEHOLDER-188: 1
  • PRED14: 1
  • SC-INDIVIDUAL: 1
  • SC-NEURAL: 1
  • SC-PHYSICAL: 1
  • SC-QUANTUM: 1
  • SC-SOCIAL: 1
  • T3: 1
  • U1: 1
  • U2: 1
  • U3: 1
  • U4: 1

Full list

  • BRIDGE-INFO-MIND ? 173_BRIDGE-INFO-MIND_Information-Consciousness-Bridge.md
  • BRIDGE-PHI-CHI ? 174_BRIDGE-PHI-CHI_Individual-Phi-To-Social-Chi.md
  • BRIDGE-PHY-THEO ? 172_BRIDGE-PHY-THEO_Physics-Theology-Bridge.md
  • D19.10 ? 145_D19.10_Law-X-Definition.md
  • D19.3 ? 138_D19.3_Law-III-Definition.md
  • D19.4 ? 139_D19.4_Law-IV-Definition.md
  • D19.5 ? 140_D19.5_Law-V-Definition.md
  • D19.6 ? 141_D19.6_Law-VI-Definition.md
  • D19.7 ? 142_D19.7_Law-VII-Definition.md
  • D19.8 ? 143_D19.8_Law-VIII-Definition.md
  • D19.9 ? 144_D19.9_Law-IX-Definition.md
  • E3.2 ? 022_E3.2_Universal-Coherence-Definition.md
  • EXP5.1 ? 042_EXP5.1_Wheeler-Delayed-Choice.md
  • EXP5.2 ? 043_EXP5.2_Quantum-Eraser.md
  • F1 ? 152_F1_Love-Measurement-Domain.md
  • F2 ? 153_F2_Joy-Measurement-Domain.md
  • F3 ? 154_F3_Peace-Measurement-Domain.md
  • F4 ? 155_F4_Patience-Measurement-Domain.md
  • F5 ? 156_F5_Kindness-Measurement-Domain.md
  • F6 ? 157_F6_Goodness-Measurement-Domain.md
  • F7 ? 158_F7_Faithfulness-Measurement-Domain.md
  • F8 ? 159_F8_Gentleness-Measurement-Domain.md
  • F9 ? 160_F9_Self-Control-Measurement-Domain.md
  • ID7.1 ? 066_ID7.1_Terminal-Observer-Is-God.md
  • LAMBDA ? 171_LAMBDA_Logos-Christ-Completion.md
  • O1 ? 167_O1_Information-Primitive.md
  • O2 ? 168_O2_Coherence-Primitive.md
  • O3 ? 169_O3_Consciousness-Primitive.md
  • O4 ? 170_O4_Agency-Primitive.md
  • OPEN17.1 ? 124_OPEN17.1_AI-Moral-Status-Question.md
  • P0 ? 161_P0_Origin-Stage.md
  • P1 ? 162_P1_Consciousness-Stage.md
  • P2 ? 163_P2_Information-Stage.md
  • P3 ? 164_P3_Coherence-Stage.md
  • P4 ? 165_P4_Agency-Stage.md
  • P5 ? 166_P5_Incompleteness-Stage.md
  • P9.4 ? 079_P9.4_Superposition-Preserved-Until-Faith.md
  • P9.5 ? 080_P9.5_Grace-Available-To-All.md
  • PLACEHOLDER-180 ? 180_PLACEHOLDER-180_Placeholder-180.md
  • PLACEHOLDER-181 ? 181_PLACEHOLDER-181_Placeholder-181.md
  • PLACEHOLDER-182 ? 182_PLACEHOLDER-182_Placeholder-182.md
  • PLACEHOLDER-183 ? 183_PLACEHOLDER-183_Placeholder-183.md
  • PLACEHOLDER-184 ? 184_PLACEHOLDER-184_Placeholder-184.md
  • PLACEHOLDER-185 ? 185_PLACEHOLDER-185_Placeholder-185.md
  • PLACEHOLDER-186 ? 186_PLACEHOLDER-186_Placeholder-186.md
  • PLACEHOLDER-187 ? 187_PLACEHOLDER-187_Placeholder-187.md
  • PLACEHOLDER-188 ? 188_PLACEHOLDER-188_Placeholder-188.md
  • PRED14.1 ? 109_PRED14.1_H0-Tension-Resolution.md
  • SC-INDIVIDUAL ? 178_SC-INDIVIDUAL_Individual-Scale-Coherence.md
  • SC-NEURAL ? 177_SC-NEURAL_Neural-Scale-Coherence.md
  • SC-PHYSICAL ? 176_SC-PHYSICAL_Physical-Scale-Coherence.md
  • SC-QUANTUM ? 175_SC-QUANTUM_Quantum-Scale-Coherence.md
  • SC-SOCIAL ? 179_SC-SOCIAL_Social-Scale-Coherence.md
  • T16.3 ? 116_T16.3_Judaism-Fails-BC-Completion.md
  • T16.4 ? 117_T16.4_Buddhism-Fails-BC1.md
  • T16.5 ? 118_T16.5_Hinduism-Fails-BC-Uniqueness.md
  • T16.6 ? 119_T16.6_Atheism-Fails-BC1-BC6.md
  • T3.1 ? 025_T3.1_Coherence-Cannot-Self-Increase.md
  • U1 ? 148_U1_Coherence-Universal.md
  • U2 ? 149_U2_Decoherence-Universal.md
  • U3 ? 150_U3_Grace-Universal.md
  • U4 ? 151_U4_Fruits-Universal.md

Unmatched sequential files

  • _FILL_REPORT.md

Graph View