============================================================ THEOPHYSICS NORMALIZATION - CODEX DISPATCH (V4.0 TEMPLATE) Agent: Claude Command Line (Codex) - Primary Dispatcher Assigned by: Claude (OP) Date: 2026-01-27
You are normalizing Theophysics axiom files into the FINAL V4.0 format (“Human-First Flow”):
- Scan Table → 2) Story → 3) Statement → 4) Definitions → 5) Judge → 6) Proofs
YOUR MISSION:
- Process the pasted RAW AXIOM FILES into the V4.0 template below.
- Output one clean markdown file per axiom (ready to drop into Obsidian).
DO NOT PROCESS (LOCKED / ALREADY DONE):
- A1.3, D1.1, A5.1, BC1, T8.1, A9.1, T11.1
QUALITY RULES:
- Extract and reorganize - do not invent.
- Mark incomplete sections with “(To be completed)“.
- Every axiom MUST have: At a Glance, Formal Statement, Defeat Conditions.
- Use Obsidian wikilinks: axiom_id.
- If the raw file does not include evidence, keep placeholders (do not hallucinate).
- Output clean markdown files only - no commentary.
============================================================ FINAL TEMPLATE V4.0 (USE THIS EXACT SHAPE)
---
axiom_id: [e.g., A1.3, BC1, T4.2, LN2.1]
title: [Full Title]
canonical_slug: [filename without .md]
tier: [1-3]
stage: [1-5]
node_type: [axiom | theorem | boundary_condition | lemma | definition | claim]
components:
definition: true
logic: true
formal: true
metaphysical: [none | implicit | explicit]
categories:
- [Primary Category]
---
# [[canonical_slug|axiom_id]] — Title
## ⚡ At a Glance
| Attribute | Detail |
| :--- | :--- |
| **Claim** | [One sentence formal claim] |
| **Category** | [Primary Category] |
| **Depends On** | [[Link]] |
| **Enables** | [[Link]] |
| **Dispute Zone** | [What critics attack] |
| **Theology?** | (Yes/No - Explicitly stated below) |
| **Defeat Test** | (To be completed) |
---
## Why This Matters (The Story)
> *The Context and Motivation.*
(To be completed)
---
## Formal Statement
> **(To be completed)**
---
## Definition Layer
> *What we mean by the terms.*
**Term 1:**
(To be completed)
---
## Category Context (The Judge)
> *Orientation for the Debate.*
**Primary Category:** (To be completed)
**Dispute Zone:** (To be completed)
**If you object to this axiom, you are likely objecting to:**
* (To be completed)
---
## Logical Dependency
> *The Chain of Custody.*
**Predicated Upon (Assumes):**
* [[Link]] — *Reason*
**Enables (Supports):**
* [[Link]] — *Reason*
---
## Logical Structure
> *The Derivation.*
1. **Premise 1:** (To be completed)
2. **Conclusion:** (To be completed)
---
## Formal Foundations (Physics View)
> *The Math & Theory.*
**Scientific Concept:**
(To be completed)
**Equation / Law:**
$$ (To be completed) $$
---
## Evidence Layer (Empirical View)
> *The Verification.*
* **Experiment / Data:** (To be completed)
---
## Canonical Sources (Authority View)
> *The Pedigree.*
(To be completed)
---
## Metaphysical Commitment (Theology View)
> *The Meaning.*
**Theological Interpretation:**
(To be completed)
---
## Defeat Conditions
> *How to break this link.*
To falsify this axiom, you must:
1. (To be completed)
---